If you had to make the perfect meal what would the criteria be? Would taste be the main factor or convenience - What about cost?
How about nutritional value? Is that a prerequisite?
If you had to develop the cheapest, healthiest, tastiest, most convenient meal - What would it be.
I think I have an answer.
There are many foods that fall into 1 or 2 categories, some are healthy and some are tasty . Some are both economical and convenient, but it is very hard to find any meal that would rate more than 5/10 in each category.
This next meal that I have devised rates:
Taste 8/10
Price 8/10
Health 10/10
Convenience 9.5/10
So what is the magic formula?......well, it's a health shake.
It's not one of those packet protein shakes that are packed with awful fillers and chemical, no, this one you have to make yourself - Notice I gave it 9.5/10 for convenience not 10/10. You have to do something.
What you will need?
For one shake you will need:
1 & 1/2 cups of oat milk
1 scoop of W.P.I protein powder (whey protein isolate)
2 tablespoons of blueberries
artificial sweetener to taste
sprinkle of cinnamon and nutmeg
2 tablespoons of mixed berry yogurt
1 teaspoon of inulin
1 teaspoon of flaxseed oil
Now proceed to blend these ingredients in the blender until smooth and enjoy.
This meal has the perfect balance of low glycemic carbohydrates, s dietary fiber, high quality proteins, vitamins and minerals, antioxidants, good bacteria and essential fatty acids - Perfect
Low G.I food is so important you can learn more Low Glycemic information here.
This meal is very reasonable in price to afford.
This shake is easy to prepare and can be made in 2 minutes.
This shake is completely delicious and you'll be excited to drink this 2-3 times a day.
The good news is that if you drink this meal shake 2-3 times per day your health, vitality and waistline will all be in appreciation.
The perfect meal.
For more helpful Solutions visit http://www.thesolutionwebsite.com
AdBrite
Wednesday, April 1, 2009
Sony Vaio P Review
I've had plenty of time to spend with Sony's bite-sized Vaio P, and now it's time to deliver a verdict on whether or not the 1.4-pound device really performs as advertised.
Sony's Vaio P managed to generate some buzz at CES, largely based around its minuscule footprint, 1.4-pound weight and ultra-wide LCD screen. Sony aggressively marketed this device as not being a netbook, but rather as a full-functioning laptop. They even went as far as to install Windows Vista Home Basic on the Vaio P despite an Atom processor, and gave it the 1600x768 resolution. This left two big questions to be answered: Is it suitable for real everyday use? And does it transcend the netbook category and enter the realm of media notebook?
If "everyday use" means some light multitasking focused around the internet, then you may be using the Vaio P with regularity. But assuming media notebook status entails watching HD Youtube vids while working in Photoshop, the answer to the second question is a definitive "no." On the other hand, any way you slice and dice it, the Vaio P is a netbook. I came into to this review with modest expectations, and tested it as such. I didn't beat the hell out of it by trying to install Adobe Premiere or play Crysis on the thing. But seeing as Sony was talking a big game, I tried to do more than browse pages, listen to music and check email.
The review unit I tested had a 1.33 GHz Z520 Atom Processor, 2 GB RAM, 64 GB SSD and Intel integrated graphics designed for MIDs. So I decided I would try to run three to five apps at any one time, essentials like SlingPlayer, Pidgin, Skype, VLC, iTunes and Gimp. Meanwhile, I'd have Firefox open, running Google Docs, Flickr and Youtube.
For the most part, this machine ran speedily, handling Pidgin and many-tabbed Firefox along with other apps. I wouldn't consider the Vaio P as fast as a standard laptop in a similar scenario, but it definitely feels faster than most netbooks. Resident netbook expert Mark Wilson also noted that in the short time he spent playing with the Vaio P, it felt two or three times faster running Vista than other netbooks running Vista.
I suppose it's no huge shock, but trying to play most video on the Vaio P was pretty rough. It could handle anything in the resolution ballpark of 320x240 without failure, but 640x480 fullscreen video would lag and 1280x720 video (from vids created on my Kodak Zi6 and from YouTube) would freeze within a few frames. Locally stored, non-HD DivX movies either ran in slow-mo or lost every third frame. The moral of the story: If Sony is going to be adamant about their product not being a netbook, adequate video playback is a must.
As far as battery life goes, if you're web browsing over wi-fi while listening to music and messaging you should get 2-3 hours out of the battery. I kept the brightness at 3/4 and had the power management set to "Vaio Optimized," and found the results to be acceptable, if average for these kinds of machines.
Sony also includes a Linux-based instant-on interface that uses the PS3-like Xross Media Bar UI but its implementation is a mixed bag. The raw functionality and design of the software is decent, allowing you to access music, photos, movies, messaging software and a custom version of Firefox. But some of the visual design and nuanced functionality are lacking to the point where you'd rather just launch Vista.
The fonts and backgrounds, specifically, make the instant-on XMB environment look cheap and dated. It's also an issue in the web browser, which uses a totally different set of fonts that border on repulsive. (Sadly, the browser makes Gizmodo look particularly bad.) Also strange is that the Pidgin messaging app in this Linux UI lets you sign into Gchat or MSN Messenger, but not AIM. Maybe this is a remnant of Sony's long-standing bad relationship with AOL and AIM.
My final complaint with regard to the instant-on OS is that switching between keyboard and cursor-based navigation is done in a half-baked way that makes it all feel unfinished. Going from the XMB to the music player, for example, requires you to use the nub to control the play/pause/skip functionality, and that isn't easy. If we can't get keyboard control in these menus, then how about some dedicated media-playback buttons? It's not like this machine is a testament to minimalism or anything.
As for the hardware itself, it's got the build quality you expect from a premium-priced Sony product. It never feels like it's going to break or loosen up, and it's clear some time and effort was put into the design. And for its size, it feels neither too heavy nor too light, and really lives up to its claims of portability.
One gripe I do have, however, is with the keyboard and mouse layout. The key size and general spacing isn't really the issue, as I've used much smaller and much worse before, but the lack of space between the space bar and the mouse buttons is really problematic. I typed this entire review on the Vaio P, and one problem I kept running into is that every time I went to hit the space bar, I accidentally tapped the mouse button. It's so sensitive it would register a click without being fully pressed. So every 90 seconds or so, the cursor moved from where I'm typing to wherever my mouse pointer was and totally derailed whatever I was typing. Annoying.
To those who are wary of the lack of trackpad, and the return of the old Thinkpad-style nub, truth is a trackpad is more effective, but the shrinkage achieved by its omission is worth it. Considering the sleek and slim measurements of the Vaio P, I have no problem plugging in a mouse if I need more precise control.
As for my final verdict, the Vaio P is an undeniably attractive, fun, exciting gadget on design alone, but I'm not quite sure it lives up to its marketing hype or its $900 starting price—ours as tested was actually $1200. The Sony Vaio P works well as a machine for the living room or kitchen, and for style reasons fits well in those environments and is easily stashed. But it won't replace your workhorse laptop, not even on a part time basis, due to graphical limitations, an inability to run resource-heavy apps and that damned issue with the keyboard and mouse.
External links:
The Wind Chime Company
Retailer of wind chimes. Link partner for home improvement, construction, online, jobs, legal, lawyer, blogs, jewelry, web design hosting, real estate, finance, financial, travel, business, shopping, gambling, insurance & mortgage, house site
Sony's Vaio P managed to generate some buzz at CES, largely based around its minuscule footprint, 1.4-pound weight and ultra-wide LCD screen. Sony aggressively marketed this device as not being a netbook, but rather as a full-functioning laptop. They even went as far as to install Windows Vista Home Basic on the Vaio P despite an Atom processor, and gave it the 1600x768 resolution. This left two big questions to be answered: Is it suitable for real everyday use? And does it transcend the netbook category and enter the realm of media notebook?
If "everyday use" means some light multitasking focused around the internet, then you may be using the Vaio P with regularity. But assuming media notebook status entails watching HD Youtube vids while working in Photoshop, the answer to the second question is a definitive "no." On the other hand, any way you slice and dice it, the Vaio P is a netbook. I came into to this review with modest expectations, and tested it as such. I didn't beat the hell out of it by trying to install Adobe Premiere or play Crysis on the thing. But seeing as Sony was talking a big game, I tried to do more than browse pages, listen to music and check email.
The review unit I tested had a 1.33 GHz Z520 Atom Processor, 2 GB RAM, 64 GB SSD and Intel integrated graphics designed for MIDs. So I decided I would try to run three to five apps at any one time, essentials like SlingPlayer, Pidgin, Skype, VLC, iTunes and Gimp. Meanwhile, I'd have Firefox open, running Google Docs, Flickr and Youtube.
For the most part, this machine ran speedily, handling Pidgin and many-tabbed Firefox along with other apps. I wouldn't consider the Vaio P as fast as a standard laptop in a similar scenario, but it definitely feels faster than most netbooks. Resident netbook expert Mark Wilson also noted that in the short time he spent playing with the Vaio P, it felt two or three times faster running Vista than other netbooks running Vista.
I suppose it's no huge shock, but trying to play most video on the Vaio P was pretty rough. It could handle anything in the resolution ballpark of 320x240 without failure, but 640x480 fullscreen video would lag and 1280x720 video (from vids created on my Kodak Zi6 and from YouTube) would freeze within a few frames. Locally stored, non-HD DivX movies either ran in slow-mo or lost every third frame. The moral of the story: If Sony is going to be adamant about their product not being a netbook, adequate video playback is a must.
As far as battery life goes, if you're web browsing over wi-fi while listening to music and messaging you should get 2-3 hours out of the battery. I kept the brightness at 3/4 and had the power management set to "Vaio Optimized," and found the results to be acceptable, if average for these kinds of machines.
Sony also includes a Linux-based instant-on interface that uses the PS3-like Xross Media Bar UI but its implementation is a mixed bag. The raw functionality and design of the software is decent, allowing you to access music, photos, movies, messaging software and a custom version of Firefox. But some of the visual design and nuanced functionality are lacking to the point where you'd rather just launch Vista.
The fonts and backgrounds, specifically, make the instant-on XMB environment look cheap and dated. It's also an issue in the web browser, which uses a totally different set of fonts that border on repulsive. (Sadly, the browser makes Gizmodo look particularly bad.) Also strange is that the Pidgin messaging app in this Linux UI lets you sign into Gchat or MSN Messenger, but not AIM. Maybe this is a remnant of Sony's long-standing bad relationship with AOL and AIM.
My final complaint with regard to the instant-on OS is that switching between keyboard and cursor-based navigation is done in a half-baked way that makes it all feel unfinished. Going from the XMB to the music player, for example, requires you to use the nub to control the play/pause/skip functionality, and that isn't easy. If we can't get keyboard control in these menus, then how about some dedicated media-playback buttons? It's not like this machine is a testament to minimalism or anything.
As for the hardware itself, it's got the build quality you expect from a premium-priced Sony product. It never feels like it's going to break or loosen up, and it's clear some time and effort was put into the design. And for its size, it feels neither too heavy nor too light, and really lives up to its claims of portability.
One gripe I do have, however, is with the keyboard and mouse layout. The key size and general spacing isn't really the issue, as I've used much smaller and much worse before, but the lack of space between the space bar and the mouse buttons is really problematic. I typed this entire review on the Vaio P, and one problem I kept running into is that every time I went to hit the space bar, I accidentally tapped the mouse button. It's so sensitive it would register a click without being fully pressed. So every 90 seconds or so, the cursor moved from where I'm typing to wherever my mouse pointer was and totally derailed whatever I was typing. Annoying.
To those who are wary of the lack of trackpad, and the return of the old Thinkpad-style nub, truth is a trackpad is more effective, but the shrinkage achieved by its omission is worth it. Considering the sleek and slim measurements of the Vaio P, I have no problem plugging in a mouse if I need more precise control.
As for my final verdict, the Vaio P is an undeniably attractive, fun, exciting gadget on design alone, but I'm not quite sure it lives up to its marketing hype or its $900 starting price—ours as tested was actually $1200. The Sony Vaio P works well as a machine for the living room or kitchen, and for style reasons fits well in those environments and is easily stashed. But it won't replace your workhorse laptop, not even on a part time basis, due to graphical limitations, an inability to run resource-heavy apps and that damned issue with the keyboard and mouse.
External links:
The Wind Chime Company
Retailer of wind chimes. Link partner for home improvement, construction, online, jobs, legal, lawyer, blogs, jewelry, web design hosting, real estate, finance, financial, travel, business, shopping, gambling, insurance & mortgage, house site
Top 10 web hosting plans!
Every of the following best web hosts in top 10 list offers:
» PHP/MySQL support, and most of them offer PHP 5 and MySQL 5 support;
» Microsoft FrontPage extensions support;
» multiple POP3 and IMAP email accounts with web-mail support;
» multiple subdomains and parked/add-on domains;
» web site building tols with free web page templates;
» unrestricted FTP access with multiple FTP accounts;
» web site stats, virus & spam protection, CGI, Perl, SSL support;
» at least 30 days money back guarantee;
» professional 24x7 technical support via email and/or by phone;
» and at least 99.9% network uptime guarantee.
The top ten web hosting ranks in the table below are based on our visitors preferences, offered webhosting features and best hosting prices. Web host general reliability, network & server uptime, quality of customer support are also taken into consideration.
Check the best 10 hosting providers in the table below:
| Rank | Top Web Hosts | Features | Highlights |
| 1 | HostGator.com | ¤ Unlim. space | ¤ cPanel/WHM |
| 2 | LunarPages.com | ¤ Unlim. storage | ¤ FREE domain |
| 3 | HostMonster.com | ¤ Unlim. webspace | ¤ FREE domain |
| 4 | WebHostingBuzz | ¤ 400 GB space | ¤ FREE domain |
| 5 | BlueHost.com | ¤ Unlim. space | ¤ FREE domain |
| 6 | EasyCGI.com | ¤ 350 GB of space | ¤ Windows 2003 OS |
| 7 | iPower.com | ¤ 1500 GB storage | ¤ FREE domain |
| 8 | 1and1.com | ¤ 10 GB web space | ¤ FREE domain |
| 9 | Dot5Hosting.com | ¤ Unlim. space | ¤ FREE domain |
| 10 | ResellersPanel.com | ¤ 15 GB disk space | ¤ FREE domain |
How to register a right domain?
Website Domain Names
There are over 40,000,000 domain names already registered, so you may be finding it very difficult to come up with a good domain name that you are happy with.Here's some practical advice on finding the right domain name...
Keep It Short
No matter what you choose make sure it is short and easily recognizable. This is the name people will find you and come to know you by. Preferably you want a one word name or a description name that will stick in peoples memory. Think of all the great sites you know. Google.com Yahoo.com Amazon.com MSN.com. Short, catchy names which are easy to remember.
Try to keep it below eight characters, if possible.
A Good Domain Name
Is easy to convey and easy to remember! The most basic (yet often overlooked) web traffic building campaign should include promoting your web address through every means you already have in place for reaching your prospects and customers, so it should be easily conveyed in any format, printed or otherwise (on your stationery, in your catalog, on your product packaging, in your voice mail messages, in your signature file at the end of your email messages, etc.).
Your website domain should be easy to remember for others to spread the word about. It should not be easily misspelled or confusing - Prospective visitors won't always have your web address spelled out in front of them. They may try to visit your site from memory. If they misspell or otherwise confuse your domain name, they won't be able to access your site. They might even end up accessing a competing domain!
Simplicity is very important. Otherwise you'll lose traffic.
Avoid Trademarked Names
The reason for this is clear. The companies who own the trademark will simply call their lawyers.
Keyword Domains or Branding?
Branding
Many of the most successful sites do not use keyword domains. These online businesses have chosen to go with a completely original domain, and brand it. A few examples are Google, Yahoo!, Amazon, eBay etc.
Keyword Domains
A keyword domain is a domain specifically chosen to take advantage of search engine traffic. Selecting a domain that matches a keyword search, the website should be able to rank higher for targeted keywords and therefore benefit from added traffic and more potential for sales.
For example, if you were a New York moving company, you might want to target the search phrase New York Moving Company by choosing the domain newyorkmovingcompany.com or new-york-moving-company.
If you have a large offline advertising budget and the budget necessary to brand your organization, a brandable domain is better choice. If, on the other hand, you're working on a shoe-string budget, choose a keyword domain and let the search engines bring the customers to you.
Buying Domain Names
If your pockets are deep enough - the simplest and most satisfactory course of action may well be to buy the "ideal" domain name from its current owner. If you're interested in pursuing the buying option, you'll want to consult the guide to buying a domain name.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)